Thank you, Republican-Appointed ASSHOLES!

Thanks to you drooling retards, I now get to sing the praises of RUTH BUZZY GINSBERG, the ugliest Justice!

I'd never think to see the bewildering day that Buzzy would be the spokes... er, thing for the 4th Amendment against state intrusion!

“How ‘secure’ do our homes remain if police, armed with no warrant, can pound on doors at will and, on hearing sounds indicative of things moving, forcibly enter and search for evidence of unlawful activity?” she asked.

In opposition, Alito is a lying asshole. As if the pigs would have NOT entered forcibly if this Hollis D. King had asserted his rights? I'm sure the pigs asked very nicely, after all. Why... one could EASILY imagine the following exchange:

"Excuse me, Mr. Drug Dealer Scumbag. We have detected the aroma of burning cannabis. Might we perchance have your kind permission to enter and examine your domicile for illicit materials and paraphernalia?"

"Why, no, sir! For you see, I have rights in my home. It is my castle! And my rights, secure they truly are in this realm of mighty laws that doth bind the authorities!"

"Right you are, good Citizen! By all means, shall we respect your rights 'gainst our unruly and illegal intrusion!. We shall return anon, with a properly written Judicial Warrant allowing us entry!"

"I await your return with pleasure, good sir! It is fine and true that you should properly defer to our laws. Have a good day!"

Talk about Bizarro World.

Between Indiana's idiotic Supreme Court's decisionS this week and this new whammy vs. the 4th Amendment... what more needs be said?

We've been living in a police state for so long, the fucking government pigs don't even have to PRETEND to respect our lives and rights.

When the shootings inevitably start, I will do my best not to laugh at the stench of dead pork. And as a Christian trying to do his best, I surely won't lift a finger to aid in their destruction. Except maybe in self-defense.

But I sure as hell will not lift a finger in their aid. Their impending deaths are of their masters' making. And well-deserved. As the un-talented Bob Dylan once said "You don't need to be a Weatherman..."

This is why Vox rocks.

Dodo Bird:
This is pure poker. Trump, Corsi, and Farrah called his bluff, and...well, Obama had the hand.

Vox: Producing a pair of aces hand-drawn on a napkin is not considered a legitimate hand in poker. Especially when one of the suits isn't hearts, diamonds, clubs or spades.

From HERE.

Too funny. The Obamatons will never admit defeat or fail in their deifications. Not even if Da Won were to be decapitated on live TV and revealed as an alien cyborg.

More Vox-isms...

Shutterbug: 5/2/11 8:44 AM: What set him off is when he asked me point blank if I believe he's going to Hell, and I calmy replied, "Yes."

Vox: The amusing thing, and something that perhaps you should have pointed out, is that it is utterly absurd to get angry about someone telling you that you are destined to go to a place you do not believe exists. Mild bemusement is the most that is rationally justified, actual anger is indicative of the sort of deep-rooted psychological problems that far too many atheists appear to harbor.

When I was agnostic, I sure never felt the need to mock anyone for their beliefs. But let someone think themselves an "atheist" and they seem to have furious anger against a judgement that should - by their own words and in their own "learned eyes" - be absolutely impotent.

Telling, that.

The White House missing any interns lately?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2eOfYwYyS_c

Shit, in the Clinton White House, they'd probably already be dead. "Drive by" or "mugging" is always a good cover.

I have also YET to see or hear any libtards admit that the real birth certificate was indeed NOT released before the election as they'd claimed for years now.

See, to admit such is to admit they were willfully stupid, liars or both. I go with both.

Can't get the man himself... But we can off his Grandkids!

Fantastic job, UN coalition!

The strange thing is... wasn't this a No-Fly Zone op to protect protesters?

When did Congress or even NATO authorize military ops aimed at killing the man? I know I'm not paying much attention because the entire enterprise is utter bullshit, but really.

Some food for thought:

As the good Lew Rockwell commented on the LRC.com blog HERE : "So today the liberators killed Gaddafi’s youngest son and three of his little grandchildren. I know that “we” can do no wrong, but does anyone ever think there might be retaliation for such acts?"

Mr. Lawrence Vance suggest some just desserts on the same page: "The New York Times is reporting that a NATO airstrike Saturday night killed the youngest son of Qaddafi and three of his grandchildren. U.S. warmongers will just say that it was collateral damage, as if that excuses murder. But how would Americans feel if foreigners killed a daughter of Bush or Obama?"

The Undertaker. I like it.

"Most Americans now find it hard to believe this shady guy is an American. I find it hard to believe he’s a person."

http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/86787.html#more-86787

Excellent vivisection of our liar in chief.