Obviously, Ron Paul's Un-American...

"If Iran was attempting to violate the non-proliferation treaty, they could hardly be blamed, since US foreign policy gives them every incentive to do so."

From here: http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul625.html

Too true.

Go Get a Copy

G

End The Fed... End The Fed...

I hate rap, but this is pretty cool.



"End the Fed." Damn straight!

Awesome Political Attack Ad:

http://www.doyouknowronpaul.com/

How does this guy do it? He actually got everything RIGHT in an attack ad!

Honesty in politics... whouda thunkit?

Hardly Surprising...

I've never understood how anyone can claim to have any integrity in Congress when they vote "yes" on things they haven't even read. I don't care why, either. Be it because the bill was being shoved through or they're too lazy. No one can read 1000 page bills.

We so deserve the Hell that is coming.



After the whomping GAZILLION $$$$ bill that got passed yesterday, I figure this image is more than appropriate:

"Truth Is Treason In The Empire Of Lies."

-Ron Paul

I like that.

Great McCain (In The Membrane) Promotional Video

About as anti-Ron Paul as you can get, eh?

I'm A Sucker For Legos...

It's Nutty And Chilling, But I Like It.

http://www.etherzone.com/2008/stang010408.shtml

More Ron Paul Stuff... Long But Good

I Think I Must Agree With This:

An argument for Dr. Ron Paul's NOT accepting federal matching funds HERE.

"On July 6, 1996, in Harry [Browne, former Libertarian candidate for President]'s acceptance speech at the Libertarian Party Convention, he stated, "I don't believe in welfare – not for individuals, not for corporations, and certainly not for politicians. So I'm the first Presidential candidate in American history to qualify for matching funds and refuse to take them. Now, if I won't take the 30 pieces of silver to get elected, you know I'm not going to sell out once I'm safely in office."

Look at the guys in the crowd on this video HERE.

Why I Support Ron Paul

(copied from my comments over at Vox's blog)

I really don't expect to change anyone's mind. I have seen how dearly folks hold their beliefs. I have literally seen the panic in their eyes when you force them into a corner logically using only their own arguments. And not trying to trick them or twist their own words.

Just simply using their own logic and demonstrating the end results.

I know. I was there. I used to think Vox was a lunatic.

Then you eventually see how the Republicans lie. How they say they believe one thing but govern in ways that will never accomplish what they say they want.

Their own track records put the lie to everything they say on the way to winning the nomination.

How much more plainly can they demonstrate the ways in which they will govern as President?

One guy has a track record I agree with the most.

That's Dr. Ron Paul.

No one else comes close. I don't believe that he will win, though I hope for it.

I don't believe he can accomplish everything he will want to even if he does win. But I hope he can convince enough folks to make changes in Congress.

I do not believe Rudy, Romney or Fred will do anything except continue the RINO BS we've had for the last seven years.

We need better if this country is going to survive as something other than the North American Union.

Because looking at our country's history, I have absolutely no doubt the President, Congress and Federal Reserve would gladly and willingly put our entire economy in the toilet and present the North American Union as our only saving grace.

More Ron Paul Goodness...

I really cannot decide how I feel about the up-coming election. I think Hillary could go either way, being either a polarizing bitch that makes the country elect whoever it is on the Republican side or attracting (not sexually, that's for sure, the dyke...) the anti-Republican sentiment that the country will undoubtedly be feeling.

Oh well.

I'm still registered Republican due to my laziness in changing my registration. So GLADLY! I'll be throwing my vote to Ron Paul. I hope it does some good.

Sounds Like An Excellent Strategy

http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul408.html

Before the U.S. House of Representatives on August 1, 2007

Madame Speaker, I rise to introduce the Congressional Responsibility and Accountability Act. This bill requires Congress to specifically authorize via legislation any proposed federal regulation that will impose costs on any individual of at least $5,000, impose costs on a business or other private organization of at least $25,000, impose aggregate costs on the American people of at least $250,000, or cause any American to lose his or her job.

According to some legal experts, at least three-quarters of all federal laws consist of regulations promulgated by federal agencies without the consent, or even the review of, Congress. Allowing unelected, and thus unaccountable, executive agencies to make law undermines democracy. Law-making by executive agencies also violates the intent of the drafters of the Constitution to separate legislative and executive powers. The drafters of the Constitution correctly viewed separation of powers as a cornerstone of republican government and a key to protecting individual liberty from excessive and arbitrary government power.

Congress’s delegation of law-making authority to unelected bureaucrats has created a system that seems to owe more to the writings of Franz Kafka than to the writings of James Madison. The volume of regulations promulgated by federal agencies and the constant introduction of new rules make it impossible for most Americans to know with any certainty the federal laws, regulations, and rules they are required to obey. Thus, almost all Americans live with the danger that they may be hauled before a federal agency for an infraction they have no reasonable way of knowing is against the law.

While it is easy for members of Congress to complain about out-of-control federal bureaucrats, it was Congress that gave these agencies the ability to create laws. Since Congress created the problem of lawmaking by regulatory agencies, it is up to Congress to fix the problem and make certain that all federal laws are passed by the people’s elected representatives. Therefore, Madame Speaker, I urge my colleagues to cosponsor the Congressional Responsibility and Accountability Act.

This is the stuff Dr. Paul should be pushing publicly. This sort of thing never gets talked about. At least it would differentiate him from the field of idiots the Republicans are running.

Another great link HERE. "The Ron Paul 30 Day Plan!"

Great Quote

"Ron Paul is thin because he won't let special interests buy him lunch."

From HERE.

Probably All Too True

http://www.lewrockwell.com/murphy/murphy117.html

"Ron Paul is the one Republican candidate who can beat Hillary Clinton in the general election."
...
"On the other hand, Ron Paul just might secure the nomination, if you and enough other Republicans actually do what the primaries intend you to do. And in that wonderful scenario, the country could see what a true fiscal conservative can do to turn this country around."

I have to agree with Vox on this one. Rudi and the other Republican dipshits like Thompson and especially Romney are liberals. They offer no TRUE alternative to Hillary.

Have a liberal "Republican" in the general election... add in the vapid voting habits of females in general and you get Hillary as Prez.

Ron Paul would trounce Hillary in every debate. Rationally and calmly, while she held in the tears. It would be great theater!

And we in this country would have a truly stark choice about what we want the Presidency to be. And we would be getting exactly what the majority ask for.

I can only hope it will come to pass... but I shan't be holding mine breath.

More Ron Paul goodness:


And I won't be shutting up about Dr. Paul until after he's out of the election one way or another.

GREAT Ron Paul YouTube Video Interview!

Homeland Security Response To Ron Paul

From HERE.

A brilliant parody from the Lew Rockwell.com folks. Very much worth the time to read.

Fools...

"The Bush administration has demonstrated in more ways than one that it does not honor our constitution, and has no respect for the American people. I, for one, will be relieved when this administration is over."

from the comment section of THIS page.

Now, I agree with everything said in the first sentence. And I actually agree with the second sentence too. But the unsaid implication of the second sentence is that things will change with the next administration. It won't.

How often do the powers of government get pulled back? EVER?

Anyone that thinks the next Prez will not use the PATRIOT Act to further their own ends is a MORON.

Unless we're somehow blessed with Ron Paul in 2008, the next President will find ways to use & abuse power. Guilliani is a faggot statist. He loves abusing power. Read up on his prosecutor days if you want evidence.

And if it's Hillary, she's gonna make Jorge Bush look like a total chump in the Civil Rights Abuses Contest.

Okay, John Stewart's Not ALL Bad...